1.         A "gimel" is the Hebrew equivalent to a "g" or "j" - not a "c". A "c" would be either a "kaf" or a "kuf".

2.         A "heh" is the Hebrew equivalent to an "h" - not an "e". In Hebrew an "e" would be an "aleph".

3.          A "vav" is the Hebrew equivalent to a "v" - not an "f".

4.         A "zayin" is a Hebrew "z" - not a "g"

5.         There is no Hebrew letter "het".
 This should be a "chet"  which is the Hebrew equilvalent to a "k" - not an "h" - see # 2

6.         A "tet" is a Hebrew "t" - not an "i".

7.         A "samakh" is a Hebrew "s" - not an "o".

8.         A "ayin" is a Hebrew "a" (with a different sound than an "aleph") - not a "p".

9.         A "peh" is a "p" - not a "q" - the numerical value of a Peh" is 80 not 70 and he says in the "P" in Prince.

10.        A "tzadi" is a Hebrew "tz" - not an "r".

11.        A "kof" is a "k" - not a "s"

12.        A "resh" is a Hebrew "r" - not a "t"

13.        A "shin" is a Hebrew "sh" - not a "u"

14.        A "tet" is a "t" - not a "v".

15.        Normally an English "w" would be two "vav"s - which would have a numerical value of 12.

   But for some reason all the dictionaries show "Wales" to only be spelled with one - this is a numerical value
of 6 - not zero.

16.        The numerical value of a "P" is 80 - not 70.

17.        The numerical value of an "R" is 200 - not 90.

18.        The numerical value of "I" is 10 - not 9

19.        The Hebrew for a "C' would be a kaf" with a numerical value of 20


   the letter "kuf" with a numerical value of 100.

   Neither adds up to 3 as he says.

20.        An "E" in Hebrew would be an "aleph" with a numerical value of 1 - not 5.

21.        see # 19

22.        The value of an "H" is 5 - not 8

23.        see # 17

24.        see # 20

25.        The numerical value of "S"  is either 60 is a "samech" is used


   300 if a "shin" is used.

   Neither has a value of 100, as he says

26.        An "O" is a "vav" and has a value of 6 - not 60.

27.        An "F" is a "pey" or "fey" with a numerical value of 80 - not 6

28.        see # 15

29.        see # 20

30.        see #25

31.        this is not the normal "newspaper" spelling for "Charles" (as Monty Judah claims), although it is not

Prince Charles in Hebrew - the Wikipedia - The heading says "Charles - Prince Wales" - this is the normal way
it is expressed and it does not add up to 666.

32.        A "mem" as a prefix means "from" Wales - not "of". Prince Charles is not FROM Wales - he is Prince
OF Wales.

    Queen Elizabeth is Queen of Canada - but she is not FROM Canada.

    I was curious and did a Google Search on the expression "Prince Charles from Wales" - it did not show -
not even one time.

Google Search

[ the last time I checked there were two hits, and one of them was this page. ]

33.        This is not the way "Wales" is spelled in Hebrew - every dictionary I have found agrees there is only
one way to spell "Wales".                   

Monty Judah's Bogus Gematria
Virtual Hebrew Keyboard from The Keys to the Bible
The TRUE Hebrew transliterations
and numerical values can be viewed